One of our team, Ryan Farrow, has thoughts that we believe should be shared with the other team leads. He's sending this note to you and to other Blue leads for dispersal to other team leaders.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
This is all theory, not concrete, but worth considering.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
1. This creature or creatures should not be able to hide within the ship this effectively without help.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
2. Considering the presence of toxins in the deceased, the physical trauma seems to be overkill.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
3. Related to "1": someone with access to the ship had to bring whatever it was on board or be in charge of slipping it past our systems.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
4. The book that was discovered in the ship library should not be missing pages. If it was meant to be redacted by the CDC, it should simply not be there at all.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
Conclusion: someone is running active interference. This may not be fact, but it should be included in calculations as a potential avenue of attack against us.
The logic is sound, I can't deny that. I try to be as skeptical as I can, but even given that, it's worth looking into.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
Though I'd like it to be more than just a theory before we send it out to the crew as a whole. People are already upset. We don't want to cause panic without cause.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
Thank you for this, Pilot. I'll speak with the others.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
You said the logic was Farrow's. Do you agree with him?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Day 73
One of our team, Ryan Farrow, has thoughts that we believe should be shared with the other team leads. He's sending this note to you and to other Blue leads for dispersal to other team leaders.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
This is all theory, not concrete, but worth considering.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
1. This creature or creatures should not be able to hide within the ship this effectively without help.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
2. Considering the presence of toxins in the deceased, the physical trauma seems to be overkill.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
3. Related to "1": someone with access to the ship had to bring whatever it was on board or be in charge of slipping it past our systems.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
4. The book that was discovered in the ship library should not be missing pages. If it was meant to be redacted by the CDC, it should simply not be there at all.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
Conclusion: someone is running active interference. This may not be fact, but it should be included in calculations as a potential avenue of attack against us.
no subject
The logic is sound, I can't deny that. I try to be as skeptical as I can, but even given that, it's worth looking into.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
Though I'd like it to be more than just a theory before we send it out to the crew as a whole. People are already upset. We don't want to cause panic without cause.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
Thank you for this, Pilot. I'll speak with the others.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
You said the logic was Farrow's. Do you agree with him?
no subject
Given what we know, yes. He would back Farrow. He would not pass it along if he did not believe in him.
FROM: pilot@cdc.org
Even if it turns out to be nothing, it's better to be prepared.
no subject
I agree. Will you pass on my thanks to Farrow, for his work?
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
And thanks to you as well. I know you’re under pressure with this.
no subject
Of course. He's just doing what any of us would do.
no subject
I know. But good work should be appreciated, nonetheless.
no subject
Thank you, then.
no subject
You're welcome, Pilot.