Skip to Main Content
Nikolai Lantsov | Sturmhond (
sturmhond
) wrote
2014
-
04
-
29
02:10 am
Entry tags:
[rpg] consignment
,
ic-contact
IC Inbox - CDC
STURMHOND@CDC.ORG
(0) UNREAD MESSAGES
CONTACTS
INBOX
CALL LOG
DOWNLOADS
text message
audio message
voice mail
<span style="font-family:courier;"> <b>SUBJECT:</B> TEXT <b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <b>FROM:</B> SURNAME.NAME@cdc.org <b>TO:</b> SURNAME.NAME@cdc.org [[200 max character message here]]</span>
<span style="font-family:courier;><b>SENT:</B> DAY#, HOUR <B>CALL ID:</B> CDC ID</span> [[3 minute max message here]]
<span style="font-family:courier;"><b>SENT:</B> DAY #, HOUR <B>( 1 ) VOICEMAIL</B> LAST NAME, FIRST NAME [[3 minute max message here]]</span>
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
DAY 119 | HOUR 02:03
retry
2015-05-03 03:04 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
Sturmhond. What were you supposed to have learned?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-03 03:47 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
Not to fail, presumably.
no subject
retry
2015-05-03 03:49 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
We didn't fail.
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-03 04:06 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
I'm aware of that.
no subject
retry
2015-05-03 04:39 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
Do you know why you're being punished?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-03 05:01 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
Because I failed, personally. It's nothing you need be concerned about, Amber.
no subject
retry
2015-05-03 05:10 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
This isn't personal.
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
I don't understand how you failed and I didn't. I need to know.
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-03 05:12 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
What did I do that you didn't?
no subject
retry
2015-05-04 03:09 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
What did
I
do that you didn't.
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
This all feels like a surprise exam.
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-04 03:48 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
Oh, we're always being tested for something. That's not a surprise. It's always been that way.
no subject
retry
2015-05-04 05:53 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
You would think the objective is to demolish worlds, not test us.
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
Unless this is still training.
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-04 02:28 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
This is punishment, not training. But perhaps, in a way, they are always testing us.
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
It would not do to be complacent.
no subject
retry
2015-05-04 03:38 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
That implies there are bigger things they're preparing us for.
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
Haven't I earned the right to tell you that instead?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-05 05:56 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
I wasn't lecturing you. You asked what I learned.
no subject
retry
2015-05-06 01:17 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
Did you set anything on fire?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-06 10:10 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
No, I protected those who did. But that was all of our plan. If that was the problem, you would think we would all be in trouble.
no subject
retry
2015-05-07 03:24 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
I wonder sometimes. Punishments are useless when no reason is given for them, right?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-09 04:04 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
By our standards, perhaps.
no subject
retry
2015-05-09 06:23 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
You're surprisingly accepting.
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-10 01:24 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
You expect me to revolt?
no subject
retry
2015-05-10 11:49 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
That's a big jump. Isn't there a middle ground?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-12 11:38 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
Of course. I could lie here and complain about it, but what's the point in that? At the end of the day, it won't change anything.
no subject
retry
2015-05-13 02:47 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
One last question, Sturmhond. Do you think this is meant to change something or to maintain the status quo?
no subject
sturmhond
2015-05-13 03:12 am (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
sturmhond@cdc.org
I think it was meant to punish us. Thus, perhaps a little of both.
no subject
retry
2015-05-13 12:59 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
FROM:
amber@cdc.org
It can't be both. That makes no sense.
(no subject)
sturmhond
-
2015-05-16 18:30 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
retry
-
2015-05-17 14:49 (UTC)
-
Expand
(no subject)
sturmhond
-
2015-05-18 02:56 (UTC)
-
Expand
2811 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
DAY 119 | HOUR 02:03
Sturmhond. What were you supposed to have learned?
no subject
Not to fail, presumably.
no subject
We didn't fail.
no subject
I'm aware of that.
no subject
Do you know why you're being punished?
no subject
Because I failed, personally. It's nothing you need be concerned about, Amber.
no subject
This isn't personal.
FROM: amber@cdc.org
I don't understand how you failed and I didn't. I need to know.
no subject
What did I do that you didn't?
no subject
What did I do that you didn't.
FROM: amber@cdc.org
This all feels like a surprise exam.
no subject
Oh, we're always being tested for something. That's not a surprise. It's always been that way.
no subject
You would think the objective is to demolish worlds, not test us.
FROM: amber@cdc.org
Unless this is still training.
no subject
This is punishment, not training. But perhaps, in a way, they are always testing us.
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
It would not do to be complacent.
no subject
That implies there are bigger things they're preparing us for.
FROM: amber@cdc.org
Haven't I earned the right to tell you that instead?
no subject
I wasn't lecturing you. You asked what I learned.
no subject
Did you set anything on fire?
no subject
No, I protected those who did. But that was all of our plan. If that was the problem, you would think we would all be in trouble.
no subject
I wonder sometimes. Punishments are useless when no reason is given for them, right?
no subject
FROM: sturmhond@cdc.org
By our standards, perhaps.
no subject
You're surprisingly accepting.
no subject
You expect me to revolt?
no subject
That's a big jump. Isn't there a middle ground?
no subject
Of course. I could lie here and complain about it, but what's the point in that? At the end of the day, it won't change anything.
no subject
One last question, Sturmhond. Do you think this is meant to change something or to maintain the status quo?
no subject
I think it was meant to punish us. Thus, perhaps a little of both.
no subject
It can't be both. That makes no sense.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)